Follow us on

The Evaluation Criteria for Green and Sustainable Finance(GSF) Products Awards

Our Evaluation Criteria

The evaluation criteria for each of our awards are designed very specifically to be able to capture quantifiable insights, but predicated on a “Belief Statement” that captures what we are looking for. Each scorecard is based on the 'Belief Statement' that encapsulates all the dimensions that define a well run institution in this category. This Belief Statement is then broken down into its components and we then set out to identify the quantifiable data that we can use as proxy for each criterion. Each Belief Statement can be broken down into its “Elements” so that candidates will know exactly what we are looking for and how much weightage we give to each of them. Each of the “Elements” is supported by quantifiable data, some which are specific financials and others which are proxies for conceptual areas, and we add them all up into a scorecard. The scorecard attempts to be as objective and transparent as possible, giving us an opportunity to discuss with the different participants of what we think we understand. The scorecard also presents us with an ability to subsequently draw up GAP analysis that can be universally applied in any benchmarking exercise.

GSF Product Awards
We seek to recognise products or services that have a clear business strategy and value proposition towards green and sustainable goals and practices. By demonstrating a sustainable and resilient business model, the recorgnised product or service differentiates from others through a unique and single-minded design focus to promote environmental, social and governance (ESG) sustainability, empowered by technology and process innovation which create exceptional society-wide impact and value.

Dimension Weight Indicator
Product proposition and design 15%
  • Alignment of the proposition with overall ESG strategy
  • Tangible and intangible value the product or service will bring to prospects
  • Sustainability and resiliency of the business model
  • ESG product design mindset
ESG Impact: 20%
  • Potential size of the social stakeholders
  • TSI/CSR/ESG score/ranking in the country/region
  • Applicable ESG/CSR ratings (FTSERussell, MSCI, ISS ESG, RobecoSAM, Refinitiv, Sustainalytics and CSRHub, etc)
  • Market of the product or service
  • Social value created
  • Inclusiveness and accessibility
Process and Technology: 10%
  • # of ESG related technology initiatives in the year under review
  • Total CO2 emission reduction due to technology enhancement
  • Working model or feature that is differentiate with the others
  • Special features that are tailored
Risk and Compliance:
 15%
  • Demonstrates awareness and implements processes and governance mechanisms to identify, evaluate and potentially mitigate material ESG risk areas across the portfolio
  • Risk management in green washing and ESG fraud
  • ESG risk management in transition and physical risks
Achievement in Year under Review 5%
  • Uniqueness of initiative
  • # of new initiatives launched
  • The ability to articulate an achievement that aligned with the overall goal to a low-carbon and sustainable society